ICSE. I had intended on making a post based on that conference, but as soon as it was over, I went into vacation mode. While on vacation I found a number of things to do that kept me away from computers. About the only computer thing I did do was compete in the 2nd round of the Google Code Jam.
This was more challenging than normal for me because Google tries to schedule their contests to be at a somewhat reasonable hour for most of the world. They've made the decision that there is this great big ocean without a lot of people living in it, and so they schedule it so the contest is in the middle of the night for the Pacific. Of course, I happened to be in Hawai'i at this time and so got up at O'dark-thirty for the 4AM contest start. Surprisingly, I not only did well enough to get a t-shirt (top 1000), but did well enough to advance to the next round (top 500).
So this is why I missed the last two posts. What about this post? Well, after two weeks away, we had a lot of catching up to do at home and at work. The little bit of free computer time I was able to find went to practicing for the 3rd round of the Google Code Jam where they would select the top 25. Unfortunately, that was for naught, as I did not advance.
24 out of 25 of the advancers solved the first 3 problems, as well as the small input set on the 4th problem. I, also, know how to solve the first 3 problems as well as the small input set on the 4th problem. So what's the difference between the advancers and me? On this problem set, speed. At the same time as I was submitting my solution to the second problem, 25th place was submitting his final solution.
The top competitors were probably a little faster at coming up with algorithms and at coding the algorithms. However, what killed me was debugging. In the first problem, I had numerous bugs in my code that I had to spend time tracking down. Careless mistakes on this problem singlehandedly knocked me out of the running to advance. On the third problem, bugs were again my downfall. I didn't take my own advice and I didn't spend a couple minutes thinking about how to best structure my data structures. I just used the first thing that popped into my head which ended up being very error prone. After the contest, when I had a couple minutes to think without the pressure, I came up with a much simpler way to code the same algorithm.
So what's the moral of this story? Don't make mistakes! :) And trying to do things in a rush just makes it more likely that you will make mistakes. Oh, and going on vacation during a contest is probably not conducive to preparing.
As for why this post is a day late... well, I am just a little bit slow.